Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack vs A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L Comparison

Car Information

5.0

/

Engine / Motor

281

250 km/h

8

4

/

1984 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5088

4969 mm

1885

1926 mm

1480

1422 mm

3052

2926 mm

461

390 L

/

4 Doors

/

106 m

Fuel Economy

7.9

9 Km/L

72

60 L

/

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

12.6

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.6 L - 6.4 L

2.0 L

292 BHP - 797 BHP

245 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

6.4 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

485 BHP

245 BHP

637

370 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Amazing power and acceleration
  • Unique American muscular design
  • Pleasant driving experience and excellent control

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The quality of interior materials is average
  • Suspension comfort is not ideal

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack if you care more about price; choose A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Dodge | Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XE 2020 2.0T R-Dynamic (250 PS)

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2018 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS) Sportbrake

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a fuel consumption of 12.66, while A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a wheelbase of 3052, while A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2926 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack uses Rear Wheel Drive, while A7 45 TFSI quattro 2.0L uses All Wheel Drive.