CarteaCompare CarsDodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack vs Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX

Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack vs Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX Comparison

Car Information

5.0

/

Engine / Motor

281

170

8

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5088

3995

1885

1745

1480

1470

3052

2520

461

355

Fuel Economy

7.9

22.7

72

37

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.6 L - 6.4 L

1.4 L - 1373 L

292 BHP - 797 BHP

91 BHP - 103 BHP

Automatic

4AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

6.4 L

1.4 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

485 BHP

91 BHP

637

130

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Amazing power and acceleration
  • Unique American muscular design
  • Pleasant driving experience and excellent control

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • The quality of interior materials is average
  • Suspension comfort is not ideal

Positive

  • Economical in fuel consumption
  • A budget-friendly price
  • Stylish exterior design

Negative

  • Power performance on highways is limited
  • The quality of interior materials is modest
  • Sound insulation can be improved

Related comparisons

Editor's PickSuzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Dodge | Charger Scatpack 6.4L V8 WideBody

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XE 2020 2.0T R-Dynamic (250 PS)

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar XF 2018 2.0T R-Sport (250 PS) Sportbrake

Dodge | Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack

VS

Mercedes Benz | CLA 250 4MATIC Coupé

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a fuel consumption of 12.66, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack has a wheelbase of 3052, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX has a wheelbase of 2520. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Dodge Charger 2024 6.4L R/T Scatpack uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX uses Front Wheel Drive.