CarteaCompare CarsDuster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs HS5 Basic 2.0T

Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs HS5 Basic 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

161 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

16

/

4341 mm

4760 mm

1804 mm

1907 mm

1693 mm

1700 mm

2676 mm

2870 mm

414 L

453 L

/

4 Doors

/

130 m

Fuel Economy

17.2 Km/L

7.1 Km/L

50 L

64 L

17.2 Km/L

7.1 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

12

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

105 BHP - 135 BHP

221 BHP - 252 BHP

Automatic & CVT & Manual

8-speed integrated manual/automatic transmission & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

115 BHP

221 BHP

156 Nm

340 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • HS5 Basic 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about price; choose HS5 Basic 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Jimny 2021 1.5L M/T

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Jimny 2020 1.5L M/T

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Jimny 2019 1.5L M/T

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

VS

MG | MG ZS 2020 1.5L STD

Renault | Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025

VS

MG | MG ZS 2018 1.5L COM

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.08. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm, while HS5 Basic 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2870 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS5 Basic 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while HS5 Basic 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.