Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
161 km/h
185
/
3
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
16
/
4341 mm
4.314
1804 mm
1.809
1693 mm
1.624
2676 mm
2.585
414 L
448
Fuel Economy
17.2 Km/L
17.2
50 L
48
17.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Driver Seat
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 1998 L
1.3 L - 1498 L
105 BHP - 135 BHP
112 BHP - 168
Automatic & CVT & Manual
6AT & Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Petrol
115 BHP
160 BHP
156 Nm
230
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.