Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs Tang L EV 670 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
161 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
16
/
4341 mm
5040
1804 mm
1996
1693 mm
1760
2676 mm
2950
414 L
/
Fuel Economy
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
105 BHP - 135 BHP
680 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Manual
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
7
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
115 BHP
680 BHP
156 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Tang L EV 670 Standard
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTang L EV 670 Standard
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tang L EV 670 Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm, while Tang L EV 670 Standard has a wheelbase of 2950. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tang L EV 670 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive, while Tang L EV 670 Standard uses No data.