E 200 vs CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240
220 km/h
/
4
/
1991 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4949
4688 mm
1880
1999 mm
1480
1439 mm
2961
2729 mm
/
4 Doors
/
535 L
/
104 m
Fuel Economy
13.7
11 Km/L
/
51 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
204 BHP - 285 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
/
Engine
2.0 T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
2.0 L turbocharged 4-cyl
/
204 HP
302 BHP
320
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 200
CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCLA 35 AMG 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 200 if you care more about fuel economy; choose CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 200 has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, E 200 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 200 has a wheelbase of 2961 , while CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2729 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 200, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 200 uses Rear Drive, while CLA 35 AMG 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.