e-2008 GT vs CX90 High Plus Comparison

Car Information

9.0

/

300

/

50

/

Engine / Motor

150

210 km/h

/

6

/

3289 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

4300

5100 mm

1987

1994 mm

1550

1745 mm

2605

3010 mm

343

566 L

/

5 Doors

/

201 m

Fuel Economy

/

10.5 Km/L

/

71 L

/

10.5 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Vinyl Upholstery

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10

9.25

/

/

/

/

/

Standard LCD

/

8

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

0.0 L - 1199 L

3.3 L - 3.3 L

110 BHP - 155 BHP

340 HP - 345 BHP

AT & Automatic

8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

6 - 8

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.3 L

Electric

Gasoline

136 BHP

345 BHP

260

500 Nm

/

V

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Motor

Single

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • e-2008 GT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Active braking
  • CX90 High Plus

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Picke-2008 GT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose e-2008 GT if you care more about price; choose CX90 High Plus if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Peugeot | e-2008 GT

VS

Exeed | LX Luxury 1.5T

Peugeot | e-2008 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.5T Luxury

Peugeot | e-2008 GT

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.5T Luxury

Peugeot | e-2008 GT

VS

Maxus | D60 Max Elite 7 Seats

Peugeot | e-2008 GT

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T High Deluxe (181 hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, e-2008 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CX90 High Plus has a fuel consumption of 9.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, e-2008 GT has a wheelbase of 2605, while CX90 High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CX90 High Plus, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. e-2008 GT uses Front Drive, while CX90 High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.