e-2008 GT vs Omoda C7 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
150
/
Dimensions
5
5
4300
4660
1987
1875
1550
1670
2605
2720
343
/
/
1578
/
19"
/
176
Fuel Economy
/
13.3
/
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6"
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
8.88"
/
√
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
√
✓
√
✓
/
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
AT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Multilink
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Disk
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
Key Spec
0.0 L - 1199 L
-
110 BHP - 155 BHP
195 HP - 341 HP
AT & Automatic
7DCT & DHT
Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.6
Electric
Gasoline
136 BHP
195 HP
260
290
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO / NORMAL / SPORT
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
e-2008 GT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
Omoda C7 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose e-2008 GT if you care more about overall equipment; choose Omoda C7 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, e-2008 GT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.52. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, e-2008 GT has a wheelbase of 2605, while Omoda C7 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Omoda C7 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. e-2008 GT uses Front Drive, while Omoda C7 Comfort uses No data.