E 450 vs EQM5 T3 Edition Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
4,950
5040 mm
2,065
1910 mm
1,461
1569 mm
2,961
2990 mm
/
433 L
Fuel Economy
66
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
/
367 - 449
134 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
DHT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Electric
TBD
/
5
4 Seater - 5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0L
/
Gasoline
Electric
367
134 BHP
750
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 450
EQM5 T3 Edition
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQM5 T3 Edition
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 450 if you care more about power; choose EQM5 T3 Edition if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 450 has a fuel consumption of No data, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 450 has a wheelbase of 2,961, while EQM5 T3 Edition has a wheelbase of 2990 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQM5 T3 Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 450 uses Four-Wheel Drive, while EQM5 T3 Edition uses Front Wheel Drive.