E 450 4MATIC vs MKZ 2.0T Premier Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,950
4925 mm
2,065
2116 mm
1,461
1476 mm
2,961
2850 mm
/
436 L
Fuel Economy
66
62.5 L
/
13.9 Km/L
/
13.9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L - 3.7 L
367 - 449
250 BHP - 365 BHP
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
367
250 BHP
750
389 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 450 4MATIC
MKZ 2.0T Premier
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMKZ 2.0T Premier
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 450 4MATIC if you care more about interior space; choose MKZ 2.0T Premier if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 450 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data, while MKZ 2.0T Premier has a fuel consumption of 7.19. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 450 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,961, while MKZ 2.0T Premier has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 450 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 450 4MATIC uses Four-Wheel Drive, while MKZ 2.0T Premier uses Front Wheel Drive.