E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon vs H9 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
4
4,959
5,137
2,065
1,904
1,468
1,493
2,961
3,060
Fuel Economy
/
11.1 Km/L
60
/
Transmission
9-speed automatic
7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT)
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
3.0L Supercharged (V6)
367 - 449
337
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission (DCT)
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
4
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
3.0L Supercharged (V6)
Hybrid
Gasoline
449 + 163 HP
337
560 + 480
400
Motor
480
/
Lithium-ion/21.2
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon
H9
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickH9
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon if you care more about fuel economy; choose H9 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9, while H9 has a fuel consumption of 9.01. Therefore, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a wheelbase of 2,961, while H9 has a wheelbase of 3,060. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon uses No data, while H9 uses No data.