E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5
5
4,959
4830
2,065
1875
1,468
1495
2,961
2790
/
1630
/
4
/
491
Fuel Economy
/
16.95
60
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Dual
Infotainment
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
9-speed automatic
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
3.0 L - 3.0 L
1.5
367 - 449
174
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
eCVT
Gasoline & Hybrid
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5
5
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.5
Hybrid
Hybrid
449 + 163 HP
174
560 + 480
/
Motor
480
/
Lithium-ion/21.2
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon if you care more about fuel economy; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a wheelbase of 2,961, while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon uses No data, while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.