E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon vs Stelvio Veloce Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
230 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4,959
4680 mm
2,065
2160 mm
1,468
1670 mm
2,961
2818 mm
/
525 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.2 Km/L
60
64 L
/
11.2 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0 L - 6.2 L
2.0 L - 2.9 L
557 BHP - 612 BHP
280 BHP - 510 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
449 + 163 HP
280 BHP
560 + 480
400 Nm
Motor
480
/
Lithium-ion/21.2
/
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon
Stelvio Veloce
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickStelvio Veloce
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon if you care more about fuel economy; choose Stelvio Veloce if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a fuel consumption of 1.0–0.9, while Stelvio Veloce has a fuel consumption of 8.93. Therefore, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon has a wheelbase of 2,961, while Stelvio Veloce has a wheelbase of 2818 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E 53 HYBRID 4MATIC+ – Saloon uses No data, while Stelvio Veloce uses All Wheel Drive.