E200 2.0L vs Baleno 1.5L GL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
240 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1462 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4
4949 mm
3990
1880 mm
1745
1480 mm
1500
2961 mm
2520
540 L
355 L
/
965/985
/
15
/
150
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
22.7
66 L
37 L
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
Interior
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
SRS front
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
4AT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
1.4 L - 1373 L
204 BHP - 285 BHP
91 BHP - 103 BHP
Automatic
4AT & Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
204 BHP
103 BHP
320 Nm
138
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
Auto
Comparison of configuration highlights
E200 2.0L
Baleno 1.5L GL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBaleno 1.5L GL
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E200 2.0L if you care more about interior space; choose Baleno 1.5L GL if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E200 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 10, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, Baleno 1.5L GL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E200 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while Baleno 1.5L GL has a wheelbase of 2520. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E200 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E200 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Baleno 1.5L GL uses Front Drive.