E300 vs CTS 2.0L Turbo Base Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
240 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
4966 mm
1880 mm
1834 mm
1480 mm
1453 mm
2961 mm
2911 mm
540 L
388 L
Fuel Economy
66 L
72 L
10 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L - 6.2 L
204 BHP - 402
268 BHP - 640 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
2.0 L
Petrol
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
268 BHP
420 Nm
400 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300
CTS 2.0L Turbo Base
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCTS 2.0L Turbo Base
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 if you care more about interior space; choose CTS 2.0L Turbo Base if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 has a fuel consumption of No data, while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 has a wheelbase of 2961 mm , while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base has a wheelbase of 2911 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 uses All Wheel Drive , while CTS 2.0L Turbo Base uses Rear Wheel Drive.