E300 vs i3 120 Ah Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
160 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
4011 mm
1880 mm
1775 mm
1480 mm
1598 mm
2961 mm
2570 mm
540 L
260 L
Fuel Economy
66 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
204 BHP - 402
184 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
/
Petrol
Electric
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
184 BHP
420 Nm
270 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Picki3 120 Ah
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 if you care more about interior space; choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 has a fuel consumption of No data, while i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 has a wheelbase of 2961 mm , while i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 uses All Wheel Drive , while i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive.