E300 vs Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
250 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
5762 mm
1880 mm
2018 mm
1480 mm
1646 mm
2961 mm
3552 mm
540 L
548 L
Fuel Economy
66 L
100 L
10 Km/L
6.8 Km/L
/
6.8 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
9-speed automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
6.7 L - 6.8 L
204 BHP - 402
453 BHP - 571 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
6.7 L
Petrol
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
563 BHP
420 Nm
900 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300
Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE300
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 if you care more about price; choose Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase has a fuel consumption of 14.71. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 has a wheelbase of 2961 mm , while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase has a wheelbase of 3552 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 uses All Wheel Drive , while Phantom 6.75L Short Wheelbase uses Rear Wheel Drive.