E300 vs Seal 6 Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
180
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4
4949 mm
4830
1880 mm
1875
1480 mm
1495
2961 mm
2790
540 L
491
/
1630
Fuel Economy
66 L
/
10 Km/L
/
/
16.95
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Dual
Infotainment
/
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
3.3
Transmission
9-speed automatic
eCVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
1.5
204 BHP - 402
174
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
eCVT
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
1.5
Petrol
Hybrid
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
174
420 Nm
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
161
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300
Seal 6 Design
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSeal 6 Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 if you care more about interior space; choose Seal 6 Design if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Seal 6 Design has a fuel consumption of 5.9. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 has a wheelbase of 2961 mm , while Seal 6 Design has a wheelbase of 2790. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 uses All Wheel Drive , while Seal 6 Design uses Front Drive.