E300 3.0L vs Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
265 km/h
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
4949 mm
5199 mm
1880 mm
1937 mm
1480 mm
1428 mm
2961 mm
3100 mm
540 L
500 L
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
12.7 Km/L
66 L
75 L
9 Km/L
12.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.9 L - 3996 L
204 BHP - 402
310 BHP - 680 BHP
7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic
Automatic
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
285 BHP
325 BHP
420 Nm
450 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
E300 3.0L
- Remote key types
Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE300 3.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E300 3.0L if you care more about price; choose Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm, while Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive has a wheelbase of 3100 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive, while Panamera 3.0L 4 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.