CarteaCompare CarsE30X Comfort vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

E30X Comfort vs Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

4025 mm

/

1770 mm

/

1560 mm

/

2620 mm

/

250 L

/

130 m

/

Fuel Economy

/

17.8

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

4

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

134 BHP

151 BHP - 153 HP

AT

6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline

400 km

/

4 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 5

/

2.0 L - 2.0 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

LED with Halogen

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

134 BHP

151 BHP

175 Nm

/

/

2.0 L

Motor

7.5

/

options.Cellular Battery

/

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • E30X Comfort

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
  • Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickE30X Comfort

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose E30X Comfort if you care more about price; choose Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure if you care more about power.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    VS

    Smart | Smart Hashtag 1 Pro+

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    VS

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    VS

    JAC | JAC E30X 2024 51.5 kWh

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    VS

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Golf 2018 1.0 TSI SE

    JAC | E30X Comfort

    VS

    Fiat | Fiat 500 2020 1.2L Spiaggina Edition

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, E30X Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a fuel consumption of 5.62. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, E30X Comfort has a wheelbase of 2620 mm, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E30X Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Hatchback 2.0L Allure uses No data.