E5 Comfort vs 11 AWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
4424
4880 mm
1830
1970 mm
1588
1601 mm
2630
2975 mm
/
545 L
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Vinyl Upholstery
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Sports
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
10.25
10.25
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Standard LCD
✓
✓
6
✓
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
204 BHP
570 BHP - 599 BHP
DHT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
650 km
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
204 BHP
599 BHP
/
650 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Motor
/
13.5
/
options.Lithium
Comparison of configuration highlights
E5 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
11 AWD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickE5 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose E5 Comfort if you care more about price; choose 11 AWD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, E5 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data, while 11 AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, E5 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2630, while 11 AWD has a wheelbase of 2975 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 11 AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. E5 Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive, while 11 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.