Eado Plus Trend vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1494 mL
/
/
185
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
18
17
4770
4765
1840
1837
1440
1495
2765
2720
/
Flush Door
/
1500
/
4
/
500
Fuel Economy
18.4
26
51
48
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
13.2
8.8
✓
/
✓
/
Segment TFT 10.25 Inches
LCD
Front Row Seats
Front Row Seats
Leather
Sensatec Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
4
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
13.2 Inches
10.1-inch rotating screen
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
DCT
/
7
/
7-DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson Independent
MacPherson
Twist-beam Non-independent
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
215/50 R17
215/55 R17
✓
/
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
Key Spec
1.5 L
1.5 L
178 BHP
177 BHP - 197 BHP
7-DCT & DCT
Automatic
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
4
/
DOHC
/
178 BHP
197 BHP
300
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Motor
181
/
Transverse
/
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Eco - Normal - Sport
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Eado Plus Trend
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Child Safety Monitoring System
- Number of Airbags
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Qin Plus FWD
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Eado Plus Trend if you care more about price; choose Qin Plus FWD if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Eado Plus Trend has a fuel consumption of 5.43, while Qin Plus FWD has a fuel consumption of 3.85. Therefore, Qin Plus FWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Eado Plus Trend has a wheelbase of 2765, while Qin Plus FWD has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Eado Plus Trend, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Eado Plus Trend uses Front Drive, while Qin Plus FWD uses Front Drive.