EC6 Long Range vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
2340
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4849
5115 mm
1995
1980 mm
1697
1920 mm
2888 mm
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
Fabric
✓
Digital
✓
Electric
✓
/
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
9
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
23
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
240 BHP - 409
AT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
7 - 8 Seater
/
3.3 L - 5.7 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
4.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
271 BHP
550 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Long Range
- Remote key types
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Long Range if you care more about power; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.