EC6 Long Range vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison

Car Information

4.4

/

700

/

550

/

100

/

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

5

7

2340

/

4 Doors

/

4849

5115

1995

1980

1697

1945

2888 mm

/

/

20

Fuel Economy

/

10.1

/

110

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

All Doors

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Hi Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

/

Passenger Door

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

Safety

/

/

Front + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8"

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

23

6

Transmission

AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode

/

Central And Rear

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)

Wheels/brakes

/

265/55 R20

/

265/55 R20

Key Spec

TBD

/

490 BHP

232 BHP - 409

AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.5

Electric

Gasoline

490 BHP

409

550 Nm

650

/

V

Motor

150

/

Technologies

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EC6 Long Range

    • Remote key types
  • Land Cruiser GXR3

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Cool Box
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEC6 Long Range

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EC6 Long Range if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser GXR3 if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Toyota | Prado VXL-3

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2020 5.6L LE T2

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2020 3.6L Launch Edition

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2021 3.6L Launch Edition

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne 2019 Diesel

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EC6 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Land Cruiser GXR3 uses Four-Wheel Drive.