EC6 Long Range vs QX60 Sensory Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
7
2340
/
4 Doors
/
4849
5033
1995
1981
1697
1770
2888 mm
2900
/
170
Fuel Economy
/
8.7
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Triple
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Transmission
AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
265 BHP - 295 BHP
AT
AT & Automatic & CVT
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
6 Seater - 7
/
3.5 L - 3.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
/
3.5
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
279
550 Nm
350
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Long Range
- Remote key types
QX60 Sensory
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEC6 Long Range
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Long Range if you care more about price; choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX60 Sensory, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive.