CarteaCompare CarsEC6 Long Range vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL

EC6 Long Range vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison

Car Information

4.4

/

700

/

550

/

100

/

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

2340

/

4 Doors

/

4849

5115

1995

1980

1697

1920

2888 mm

/

Fuel Economy

/

9.3

/

110

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8"

/

/

/

/

/

/

23

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

490 BHP

240 BHP - 409

AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.3 L

Electric

Diesel

490 BHP

304 BHP

550 Nm

700

Motor

150

/

Technologies

9

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EC6 Long Range

    • Remote key types
  • Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Temperature Display
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickToyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EC6 Long Range if you care more about power; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee Overland 3.6L

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2024 3.6L Overland

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2020 SRT8

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2021 SRT8

Nio | EC6 Long Range

VS

Jeep | Grand Cherokee SRT8

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EC6 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL uses All Wheel Drive.