EC6 Long Range vs Wrangler Sahara 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2340
/
4 Doors
4 Doors
4849
4785 mm
1995
1877 mm
1697
1869 mm
2888 mm
3007 mm
/
487 L
/
254 m
Fuel Economy
/
7 Km/L
/
87 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
✓
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
Leather
✓
Digital
✓
Electric
✓
/
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.8"
12
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
23
8
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
270 BHP - 470
AT
8AT & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5
4 - 5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 6.4 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
270 BHP
550 Nm
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Long Range
- Remote key types
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickWrangler Sahara 2.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Long Range if you care more about power; choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Long Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Long Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Long Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.