EC6 Standard Range vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2292
/
4 Doors
5 Doors
4849
4583 mm
1995
2008 mm
1697
1969 mm
2888 mm
2587 mm
/
397 L
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.8"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
/
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
490 BHP
300 BHP - 635
AT
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5
5 - 8 Seater
/
2.0 L - 5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
490 BHP
300 BHP
550 Nm
400 Nm
/
V
/
Single Turbo
Motor
150
/
Technologies
9
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EC6 Standard Range
- Remote key types
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EC6 Standard Range if you care more about interior space; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EC6 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EC6 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2888 mm , while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EC6 Standard Range, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EC6 Standard Range uses All Wheel Drive , while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.