CarteaCompare CarsEclipse Cross GLS Medium Line vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4547 mm

4760 mm

1805 mm

1930 mm

1685 mm

1927 mm

2670 mm

2750 mm

657 L

400 L

/

5 Doors

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

14.3 Km/L

10 Km/L

63 L

75 L

14.3 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

9

9

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

225/55R18

/

225/55R18

/

Key Spec

1.5 L

2.0 L

147 BHP - 148 HP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

8 speed CVT & Automatic & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

147 BHP

224 BHP

250 Nm

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Security System
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

VS

Haval | Jolion 1.5T Basic

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

VS

Jeep | Renegade 2.4L Sport (4x2)

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

VS

Toyota | Toyota Urban Cruiser 2023 1.5L GL

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

VS

Haval | Haval H6 2021 Supreme

Mitsubishi | Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Ultimate

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line has a fuel consumption of 6.99, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Eclipse Cross GLS Medium Line uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.