EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4490 mm
4771 mm
1874 mm
1870 mm
1613 mm
1828 mm
2750 mm
2790 mm
Fuel Economy
/
10 Km/L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
215 BHP
TBD
TBD
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
5 Seater
7 Seater
/
2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
215 BHP
340 Nm
280 Nm
/
2.0 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAlreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.