EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4360 mm
1874 mm
2032 mm
1613 mm
1525 mm
2750 mm
2670 mm
/
380 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.9 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
/
TBD
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
155 BHP
340 Nm
240 Nm
/
1.2 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.