EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4341 mm
1874 mm
1804 mm
1613 mm
1693 mm
2750 mm
2676 mm
/
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
TBD
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
115 BHP
340 Nm
156 Nm
/
1.6 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.