EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4490 mm
1874 mm
1874 mm
1613 mm
1613 mm
2750 mm
2750 mm
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
153 BHP - 305 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
TBD
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
Electric
Electric
153 BHP
305 BHP
340 Nm
680 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.