EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs EREV RWD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4490 mm
4,825
1874 mm
1,980
1613 mm
1,620
2750 mm
2,940
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
/
Single-speed Fixed-Ratio Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
/
TBD
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Hybrid
153 BHP
310
340 Nm
367
/
1.5 L
/
1,152
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
EREV RWD
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEREV RWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose EREV RWD if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while EREV RWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while EREV RWD has a wheelbase of 2,940. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EREV RWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while EREV RWD uses No data.