EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
205 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4855 mm
1874 mm
1860 mm
1613 mm
1465 mm
2750 mm
2805 mm
/
450 L
Fuel Economy
/
11.8 Km/L
/
70 L
/
11.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
157 BHP - 265 BHP
TBD
AT & Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
240 BHP
340 Nm
350 Nm
/
2.0 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.0L T-GDI GT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a fuel consumption of 8.47. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT has a wheelbase of 2805 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Optima 2.0L T-GDI GT uses Front Wheel Drive.