EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs V23 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4490 mm
4220
1874 mm
1915
1613 mm
1845
2750 mm
2735
/
19
/
1613
/
1641
/
42
/
40
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
255/55 R19
/
255/55 R19
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
153 BHP - 305 BHP
134
TBD
AT
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
Electric
Electric
153 BHP
134
340 Nm
/
Motor
/
180
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
V23
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickV23
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose V23 if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while V23 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while V23 has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while V23 uses No data.