EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) vs Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4490 mm
4175 mm
1874 mm
1775 mm
1613 mm
1610 mm
2750 mm
2500 mm
/
375 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
47 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
115 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
1.6 L - 1586 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
153 BHP
115 BHP
340 Nm
156 Nm
/
1.6 L
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about interior space; choose Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD has a wheelbase of 2500 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive, while Vitara 1.6L GLX+ 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.