CarteaCompare CarsEHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

/

Engine / Motor

N/A, Electric

6

/

210 km/h

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

7 Seater

7 Seater

5209

5115 mm

2010

1980 mm

1731

1920 mm

3110

2890 mm

/

5 Doors

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

/

9.4 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

9

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

429 BHP

240 BHP - 409

Automatic

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

320 km

/

6 - 7 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 4000 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

0.0 L

4.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

429 BHP

271 BHP

600

385 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Audi | Audi Q8 2023 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Audi | Audi Q8 2024 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Audi | Audi Q8 2022 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

BMW | BMW X5 2022 40i xDrive M Sport

Hongqi | EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac Escalade 2019 6.2L Premium Luxury

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.