EHS9 Executive vs Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
Chinese
GCC
/
3460 cc
Dimensions
7 Seater
7
5 Doors
5 Doors
5209 mm
5145 mm
2010 mm
1980 mm
1713 mm
1890 mm
3110 mm
2850 mm
438 L
1004 L
200 m
235 mm
Fuel Economy
/
9.3 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
4-Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Bucket
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
16.2
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
12.3
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
429 BHP - 543 BHP
240 BHP - 409
Automatic
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Electric
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
320 km - 515 km
/
4 Seater - 7 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
/
3.3 L - 5.7 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
429 BHP
409 BHP
300+450
650 Nm
/
V
/
3.5 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
8
/
options.Lithium-Ion
/
160+245 kW
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EHS9 Executive
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about interior space; choose Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Executive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GXR uses Four Wheel Drive.