CarteaCompare CarsNio EL8 Standard Range vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

Nio EL8 Standard Range vs Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD Comparison

Car Information

4.1

/

515

/

100

/

Engine / Motor

20

240 km/h

/

6

/

3500 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

6

8 Seater

5099

5334 mm

2199

2006 mm

1750

1930 mm

3070

3111 mm

/

5 Doors

/

530 L

/

250 m

Fuel Economy

/

11 Km/L

/

88 L

/

11 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

33+ sensors + LiDAR

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8"

12

23

8

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Adaptive air suspension

/

/

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

480d BHP - 654 BHP

300 BHP - 440

AT

10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5 - 6

6 Seater - 8

/

3.5 L - 5.4 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

3.5 L

Electric

Gasoline

480d BHP

380 BHP

700

637 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Motor

2

/

Technologies

10 Modes

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Nio EL8 Standard Range

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
  • Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Excellent towing ability
  • Comfort and ride quality

Negative

  • Fuel consumption is high
  • Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
  • The initial purchase price is high

Related comparisons

Editor's PickExpedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Nio EL8 Standard Range if you care more about power; choose Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Nio | EL8 Standard Range

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 SE (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Nio EL8 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Nio EL8 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 3070, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD has a wheelbase of 3111 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nio EL8 Standard Range uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Expedition XLT 3.5L (380 HP) RWD uses Rear Wheel Drive.