CarteaCompare CarsNio EL8 Standard Range vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Nio EL8 Standard Range vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison

Car Information

4.1

/

515

/

100

/

Engine / Motor

20

210 km/h

/

6

/

3490 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

6

7 Seater

5099

5115 mm

2199

1980 mm

1750

1920 mm

3070

2890 mm

/

5 Doors

/

1004 L

/

221 m

Fuel Economy

/

9.4 Km/L

/

110 L

/

9.4 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

33+ sensors + LiDAR

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.8"

9

23

6

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Adaptive air suspension

/

/

/

Four-Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

TBD

/

480d BHP - 654 BHP

240 BHP - 409

AT

10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual

Electric

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5 - 6

7 - 8 Seater

/

3.3 L - 5.7 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

4.0 L

Electric

Gasoline

480d BHP

271 BHP

700

385 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Motor

2

/

Technologies

10 Modes

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Nio EL8 Standard Range

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
  • Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Sensor Rear Tailgate
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser 4.0L EXR

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Nio EL8 Standard Range if you care more about interior space; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Polestar | Polestar 3 2024 Long Range (Dual Motor)

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Nio | EL8 Standard Range

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Hongqi | EHS9 Executive

Nio | Nio EL8 Standard Range

VS

Jaguar | Jaguar I Pace 2022 EV400 SE (AWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Nio EL8 Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Nio EL8 Standard Range has a wheelbase of 3070, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nio EL8 Standard Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nio EL8 Standard Range uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.