Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4
/
4710
4572 mm
1825
1825 mm
1430
1482 mm
2720
2670 mm
/
430 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.3 Km/L
/
48 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
1.5
127 BHP - 159 BHP
116
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Engine
1.6 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
114 BHP
155
141 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickArrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about interior space; choose Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while Arrizo 5 1.5L (Comfort) uses Front Wheel Drive.