Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs ES90 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4
/
4710
5000
1825
2120
1430
1549
2720
3102
/
2441
Fuel Economy
/
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
/
Rear Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
103 - 159 BHP
333 BHP
Automatic & CVT
DHT
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
128 BHP
333 BHP
155
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
ES90
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES90
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about overall equipment; choose ES90 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while ES90 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while ES90 has a wheelbase of 3102. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ES90, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while ES90 uses Rear Drive.