Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs i3 120 Ah Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
4
/
4710
4011 mm
1825
1775 mm
1430
1598 mm
2720
2570 mm
/
260 L
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
103 - 159 BHP
184 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 - 5
4 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Engine
1.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
128 BHP
184 BHP
155
270 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
i3 120 Ah
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickElantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about price; choose i3 120 Ah if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while i3 120 Ah has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while i3 120 Ah has a wheelbase of 2570 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while i3 120 Ah uses Rear Wheel Drive.