Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs IS 300 Premier 2.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4
4 Doors
4710
4665 mm
1825
1810 mm
1430
1430 mm
2720
2800 mm
/
480 L
/
140 m
Fuel Economy
/
13 Km/L
/
66 L
/
13 Km/L
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 3.5 L
103 - 159 BHP
241 BHP - 312 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8 Speed Sport Direct Shift
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater - 5 Seater
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
241 BHP
155
350 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
IS 300 Premier 2.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickElantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about price; choose IS 300 Premier 2.0L if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2800 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IS 300 Premier 2.0L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while IS 300 Premier 2.0L uses Rear Wheel Drive.