Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi vs Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4
/
4710
4660
1825
1795
1430
1440
2720
/
/
444
Fuel Economy
/
18.2
/
51
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
MacPherson strut type
/
Coupled torsion beam axle / Multi-Link(N Line)
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
103 - 159 BHP
153 BHP - 153 BHP
Automatic & CVT
6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
128 BHP
153 BHP
155
/
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi
Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Advanced security equipment
Negative
- There is little space in the rear seats
- Sound insulation while driving is poor
- Average engine performance
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda 3 Sedan Entry grade
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi if you care more about overall equipment; choose Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a fuel consumption of 5.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi has a wheelbase of 2720, while Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Elantra Gamma 1.6 Mpi uses No data, while Mazda 3 Sedan Entry grade uses No data.