ELEVATION AWD 2.0L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17"
/
4,597
4760 mm
1,892
1930 mm
1,672–1,680
1927 mm
2,730
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
9–10
10 Km/L
59
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
HIGH-DEFINITION REAR VISION
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
forward
/
BLIND ZONE STEERING ASSIST
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15"
12.3
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
9 speed AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
MacPherson-strut
/
Four-link independent
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1490 L
2.0 L
170 BHP - 252 BHP
224 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
✓
Single Turbo
252 hp
224 BHP
433 N·m
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
ELEVATION AWD 2.0L
- Rear Camera
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose ELEVATION AWD 2.0L if you care more about overall equipment; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, 300 Challenger 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, ELEVATION AWD 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2,730, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. ELEVATION AWD 2.0L uses Four-Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.