EMKOO GL vs 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV Comparison

Car Information

132

/

270

/

4680×1905×1680

/

1.5

/

Engine / Motor

/

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

19 inch

/

4680

4760 mm

1905

1930 mm

1680

1927 mm

2750

2750 mm

/

5 Doors

/

400 L

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

18.2

15 Km/L

/

75 L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

10.1

12.3

/

/

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

9

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Electronic Parking

/

235/45 R19

/

235/45 R19

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.0 L

140 BHP - 177

217 BHP - 342 BHP

Automatic & DCT & DHT

8-Speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Engine

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

Turbocharge

/

177

342 BHP

132

/

270

648 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EMKOO GL

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Power Tailgate
    • Electric Locks
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Driving Recorder
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Active Safety Warning System
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEMKOO GL

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EMKOO GL if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

GAC | EMKOO GL

VS

Geely | EX5 Pro

GAC | EMKOO GL

VS

Hongqi | HS3 1.5T Luxury

GAC | EMKOO GL

VS

Peugeot | 2008 GT

GAC | EMKOO GL

VS

JAC | JS6 Flagship

GAC | EMKOO GL

VS

Jetour | X70 Plus Luxury 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EMKOO GL has a fuel consumption of 5.49, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, EMKOO GL is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EMKOO GL has a wheelbase of 2750, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EMKOO GL uses Front Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T HEV uses Four Wheel Drive.