EQA 250+ vs GLA 250 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
Dimensions
5
5
2,050
1,600
4,463
4,410
1,830
1,834
1,620
1,611
2,729
2,729
Fuel Economy
/
6.6 L/100 km
Comfort
/
✓
Battery/Charging
100kW
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
190
224 hp
385
/
/
165
/
350 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQA 250+
GLA 250 4MATIC
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGLA 250 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQA 250+ if you care more about overall equipment; choose GLA 250 4MATIC if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQA 250+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of 15.15. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQA 250+ has a wheelbase of 2,729, while GLA 250 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,729. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 250+ uses Front Drive, while GLA 250 4MATIC uses No data.