EQA 250+ vs Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
237 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
2,050
/
4,463
4753 mm
1,830
1893 mm
1,620
1659 mm
2,729
2808 mm
/
550 L
Fuel Economy
/
13.7 Km/L
/
70 L
/
13.7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Battery/Charging
100kW
/
Transmission
Single-speed automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
/
2.0 L
Electric
Gasoline
190
252 BHP
385
370 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L
/
272 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EQA 250+
Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ5 45 TFSI quattro Design
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EQA 250+ if you care more about overall equipment; choose Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EQA 250+ has a fuel consumption of No data, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a fuel consumption of 7.3. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EQA 250+ has a wheelbase of 2,729, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design has a wheelbase of 2808 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EQA 250+ uses Front Drive, while Q5 45 TFSI quattro Design uses All Wheel Drive.